Compare Page

Completeness of optional attributes

Characteristic Name: Completeness of optional attributes
Dimension: Completeness
Description: Optional attributes should not contain invalid null values
Granularity: Element
Implementation Type: Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type: Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of invalid null values reported in an optional attribute per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Provide default values for each valid case of null values for the attribute in concern so that null values occur only for actually missing values which are invalid cases for the attribute in concern. Case1: Attribute values that are not defined for a particular entity instance (e.g.: Maiden name of unmarried women ) Such instances will get the default value “NOT DEFINED”

Case2 : Attribute values that are defined for the entity instance whereas the real value for the attribute instance is null (eg: Vehicle number of a student who does not have a vehicle) Such instances will get the default value “NOT EXIST”

Case3: Attribute values are defined for the entity instance and the attribute instance should have a value (Student’s date of birth).

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to define valid null cases

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
Let us consider a Person relation with the attributes Name, Surname,

BirthDate,and Email. The relation is shown in Figure 2.2. For the tuples with Id equalto2,3,and 4, the Email value is NULL. Let us suppose that the person represented by tuple 2 has no e-mail: no incompleteness case occurs. If the person represented by tuple 3 has an e-mail, but its value is not known then tuple 3 presents an incompleteness. Finally, if it is not known whether the person represented by tuple 4 has an e-mail or not, incompleteness may not be the case.

ID 1

2 3 4

Name John

Edward Anthony Marianne

Surname Smith

Monroe White Collins

BirthDate 03/17/1974 02/03/1967 01/01/1936 11/20/1955

Email

smith@abc.it NULL NULL NULL

not existing existing but unknown not known if existing

Fig. 2.2. The Person relation, with different null value meanings for the e-mail attribute

C. Batini and M, Scannapieco, “Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques”, Springer, 2006.
1) A database contains information on repairs done to capital equipment. How- ever, it is a known fact that sometimes the repairs are done and the informa- tion about the repair is just not entered into the database. This is the result of lack of concern on the part of the repair people and a lack of enforcement on the part of their supervisors. It is estimated that the amount of missing information is about 5%. This database is probably a good-quality database for assessing the genral health of capital equipment. Equipment that required a great deal of expense to maintain can be identified from the data. Unless the missing data is disproportionately skewed, the records are usable for all ordinary decisions. However, trying to use it as a base for evaluating information makes it a low-quality database. The missing transactions could easily tag an important piece of equipment as satisfying a warranty when in fact it does not.

2) A blank for COLLEGE_LAST_ATTENDED may be accurate or inaccurate. If the person it applied to had attended college, it would be inaccurate. This is another case of valid but not accurate.

J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
1) A null value is a missing value. However, a value that is missing may provide more information than one might think because there may be different reason that it is missing. A null value might actually represent an unavailable value, an attribute that is not applicable for this entity, or no value in the attribute’s domain that correctly classifies this entity. Of course, the value may actually be missing.

2) When the null value (or absence of a value) is required for an attribute, there should be a recognizable form for presenting that null value that does not conflict with any valid values.

LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
1) Ability to distinguish neatly (without ambiguities) null and default values from applicable values of the domain.

2) Completeness refers to the degree to which values are present in a data collection, as for as an individual datum is concerned, only two situations are possible: Either a value is assigned to the attribute in question or not. In the latter case, null, a special element of an attribute’s domain can be assigned as the attribute’s value. Depending on whether the attribute is mandatory, optional, or inapplicable, null can mean different things.

REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc.

 

Completeness of records

Characteristic Name: Completeness of records
Dimension: Completeness
Description: Every real world entity instance, that is relevant for the organization can be found in the data
Granularity: Record
Implementation Type: Process-based approach
Characteristic Type: Usage

Verification Metric:

The number of tasks failed or under performed due to missing records
The number of complaints received due to missing records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Implement a process level validation mechanism to avoid occurrence of missing records (1) A buyer must record/verify an expense or asset in accordance with accepting/receiving any purchased items. (2)New application are stored in a temporary cabinet after entering into the system and they will be transferred to the file cabinet at the end of every week after the property manager cross check them with the system
Execute database commits upon transaction sequences in application programs and make sure all the transactions in the sequence successfully commit and generate the required records at the end of the sequence. (1) In generating the MRP, the database operations will not be committed unless all materials in BOM is successfully executed for MRP
When distributed databases are used or online data collection devices are used, ensure the synchronisation/replication of records happen successfully without distortions and omissions. (1) EFTPOS transactions are replicated with bank database and create the new balance B/F in the account
Implement periodic audit process for critical tangible objects that are recorded as data in database (1) Annual audit for tangible assets in the organisation
Implement a validation mechanism in data transfers considering the business rules to monitor and ensure all records relevant to a event/transaction is transferred successfully. (1) Rules to verify the number of records in the source file and destination file (2) All records relevant to a customer trip is transferred to the central database from online data stores
Maintain error logs for system transactions and regularly monitor them and perform relevant forensic activities to find missing records. (1) A failed sales order creation

Validation Metric:

How mature is the process to prevent missing records

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
if Dept is a relation representing the employees of a given department, and one specific employee of the department is not represented as a tuple of Dept, then the tuple corresponding to the missing employee is in ref(Dept),and ref(Dept) differs from Dept in exactly that tuple. C. Batini and M, Scannapieco, “Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques”, Springer, 2006.
if a column should contain at least one occurrence of all 50 states, but the column contains only 43 states, then the population is incomplete. Y. Lee, et al., “Journey to Data Quality”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.
the database should contain all customers in North and South America, but it is known that the database reflects only a portion of the company’s customers. Coverage in this example is the percent- age of customers actually captured in the database compared to the population of all customers that should be in it. D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
A record exists for every Real-World Object or Event the Enterprise needs to know about. ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing.
Completeness of data refers to the extent to which the data collected matches the data set that was developed to describe a specific entity. Monitoring for incomplete lists of eligible records or missing data items will identify data quality problems. HIQA 2011. International Review of Data Quality Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Ireland. http://www.hiqa.ie/press-release/2011-04-28-international-review-data-quality.
Quality of having all data that existed in the possession of the sender at time the data message was created. ISO 2012. ISO 8000-2 Data Quality-Part 2-Vocabulary. ISO.
Data is complete if no piece of information is missing – anti-example: "The Beatles were John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr" KIMBALL, R. & CASERTA, J. 2004. The data warehouse ETL toolkit: practical techniques for extracting. Cleaning, Conforming, and Delivering, Digitized Format, originally published.
Every real-world phenomenon is represented. PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a.